| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: grant table anxiety [was RE: [Xen-devel] GNTTABOP_unmap_grant_ref]
Per Mark's pointers to LWN articles, Linux's page remapping scheme is
churning. Once that settles, is a reasonable test of "sensibleness"
that paravirtual Linux be able to map shared pages in the same manner as
traditional Linux maps device based memory?
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Pratt
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 2:37 PM
To: King, Steven R; Keir Fraser; Mark Williamson; Rusty Russell
Cc: xen-devel
Subject: RE: grant table anxiety [was RE: [Xen-devel]
GNTTABOP_unmap_grant_ref]
> I've aired grievances against grant tables in other threads, but now
> I'm getting worried all over again. Your suggestions give a hint of
> the intricate handling required to manage shared pages. IMHO, this
> pushes paravirtual guests to unnatural lengths, not to mention
> prospects in pure-virtual environments.
Allowing user space to get access to shared pages by allowing them to
map pages in a special device seems pretty sensible, and is pretty
trivial to implement in the kernel.
> Could we dispense with these complexities if a 3rd party
> (Xen?) owned shared pages?
No, the accounting issue is totally orthogonal.
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home