xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] dom0_mem more flexible?

from [Ralph Passgang]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] dom0_mem more flexible?
From:	Ralph Passgang <ralph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:16:04 +0100
Delivery-date:	Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:57:51 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200601131458.17312.marcus.hardt@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<200601131458.17312.marcus.hardt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	KMail/1.9.1

thats supported in xen3... just don't assign memory to your dom0 by don't 
using the dom0_mem boot parameter and your dom0 will use almost the complete 
available RAM.

If you start domU's, then the required amount of RAM is ballooned out of dom0 
and will be used in your domU automaticlly.

The minimum amount of RAM, which dom0 will keep is configured 
in /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp.

--Ralph

Am Freitag, 13. Januar 2006 14:58 schrieb Marcus Hardt:
> Hi There,
>
> just a short question about dom0_mem: It would be nice for me if it was
> more flexible, i.e. run my WS in dom0 with all the RAM available and only
> reducing that RAM whenever I want to start a domU.
>
> Is this supported?
> Is this planned?
>
> Thank you,

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] dom0_mem more flexible?, Marcus Hardt Re: [Xen-devel] dom0_mem more flexible?, Ralph Passgang <= RE: [Xen-devel] dom0_mem more flexible?, Ian Pratt

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] sedf scheduler may cause a CPU fatal trap, Guillaume Thouvenin
Next by Date:	[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Problem running xenmon, Anand
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] dom0_mem more flexible?, Marcus Hardt
Next by Thread:	RE: [Xen-devel] dom0_mem more flexible?, Ian Pratt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]