xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] yanked share, round 2
An ideal solution to this problem would be to keep a separate pool of
shared memory that neither domain owned. That removes any concerns
about ownership.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
King, Steven R wrote:
Hi folks,
A previous thread discussed complications around DomU's sharing memory
pages with each other:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-12/msg00499.html
To summarize, DomU's get into trouble, e.g. unable to shutdown,
unless the remote DomU's play nice. Since DomU's do not trust each
other, that is problematic. I'd like to discuss how to clean away
this dependency.
Here's one idea. The goal is to robustly decouple the sharing and
remote domains.
Grant tables add a new GTF_safe flag, settable by the sharing DomU.
In order to map a GTF_safe page, a remote domain must provide a page
of its own, which I'll call an "under page".
Xen holds the under-page on behalf of the remote DomU and maps
the shared page into the remote DomU's machine.
At any time, the sharing DomU can unshare the page, crash, etc,
which ends ALL foreign access to that page, not just new mappings.
For each remote domain that still maps the unshared page, Xen maps the
remote's under-page in place of the unshared page.
The remote domain can unmap at any time and recover its under-page.
The purpose of the under-page is to plug the memory hole in the remote
DomU created by a surprise unsharing. A nervous remote DomU could
check that a share is GTF_safe before proceeding to map the page.
Good, bad or ugly?
-steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] yanked share, round 2, King, Steven R
- RE: [Xen-devel] yanked share, round 2, King, Steven R
- RE: [Xen-devel] yanked share, round 2, King, Steven R
- RE: [Xen-devel] yanked share, round 2, King, Steven R
- RE: [Xen-devel] yanked share, round 2, King, Steven R
- RE: [Xen-devel] yanked share, round 2, King, Steven R
|
|
|