 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] asm/page.h inconsistencies?
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] asm/page.h inconsistencies? |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:29:19 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:34:40 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Could anyone explain the non-symmetric implementation of __pte/__pmd/__pud/__pgd compared to pte_val/pmd_val/pud_val/pgd_val on x86-64? On i386, the "... & 1" is consistently used across all of these, but on x86-64 only the __pte/pte_val pair does so. Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] xen 3 dom0 eats memory, Patrick Scharrenberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] x86-64's __PAGE_OFFSET, Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Who gives exeption routine in main.py 'Not found' in ex ?, Yoshinori Katase |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] asm/page.h inconsistencies?, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
