|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] make network-bridge work in more environments
Dear Mr Virtual,
I suspect that Dave Virtual may not be your real name.
I can take legal advice on whether I can accept a patch from a source
that I suspect may be operating under a pseudonym, but I thought I might
contact you to see whether you would be prepared to reveal your true
identity in a signed-off-by: line?
The OSDL DCO does create extra some extra 'paperwork', but it's surely
important that we cover our collective arses. As a supporter of the Xen
project I'm sure you appreciate that.
Thanks,
Ian
PS: If your name really is Mr Virtual, I apologise profusely. With a
name like that you should definitely be working for XenSource Inc. We're
always hiring, so please send us your CV! :-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Virtual [mailto:dave.virtual@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 16 December 2005 07:52
> To: Ian Pratt
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] make network-bridge work in
> more environments
>
> Here you go.
>
> - Dave
>
>
> On 12/15/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] make network-bridge work in more
> > environments
> >
> > The attached patch (against xen-unstable) generalizes the
> > network-bridge (and xen-network-common.sh) script so
> they work:
> > (a) in non-Gentoo environments missing ifup/down
> > (b) when interpreted by a simple-minded shell (e.g.
> busybox sh)
> > (c) with kernel-level ip=dhcp (no longer rely on parsing ip
> > params from the kernel cmd line)
> >
> > It should still work in all the old cases. I've verified it
> > still works on my FC4-IA32e domain 0, as well as
> under busybox.
>
> Thanks for the patch, but please can we have a
> signed-off-by: line
>
> Ian
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|