| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] latest USB code including Xenidc documentation
Harry Butterworth wrote:
I'm happy to do that for the USB driver if that's what people decide
they want but I'm reluctant to do it without people having first
considered the idea of having a higher level interdomain communication
API and thought about xenidc as a possible option.
I think Muli's point (which I agree with) is that the question of a
higher level interdomain communication API is orthagonal to the USB
driver and that submitting the two at once makes it difficult to review
because of sheer size.
In fact, what I would really like to see is a before and after with the
USB driver (one version that uses the current mechanism and uses
xenidc). This would be a good way to evaluate how much complexity
xenidc introduces/removes from the drivers. xenidc is a big decision
because it means yet another rewrite of all the device drivers (we've
gone through how many in the past year already :-)).
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Cheers,
Muli
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home