| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Re: Daily Xen Builds
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 04:50:16PM -0000, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > IP> The changes to xm-test you posted on Friday seem to have
> > broken the
> > IP> initrd such that the guest can't mount /proc, which seems
> > to account
> > IP> for the failures.
> >
> > Actually, the problem is not from my Friday changes. I
> > pulled the initrd's from David's machines. The machine with
> > only 8 failures had a correct initrd, while the others had an
> > older version that was made before the init script was made
> > to be +x. Not sure why. He is going to blow away all of his
> > existing trees today and see if that fixes the problem.
> >
> > Having the rcS file not +x meant that /proc wasn't being
> > mounted, which led to many failures. We cleared this up
> > shortly after the import since a lot of file permissions were lost.
>
> OK, so I believe we're agreed it's "case closed" as regards an actual
> regression.
Sorry for the firedrill, the jump in fails looked really suspicious to me,
and I wanted to make sure folks were payings attention. :)
I think this proves that xm-test could really use a sanity check upfront,
where it ensures certain things look alright before starting the rest of the
tests.
-Sean
--
__________________________________________________________________
Sean Dague Mid-Hudson Valley
sean at dague dot net Linux Users Group
http://dague.net http://mhvlug.org
There is no silver bullet. Plus, werewolves make better neighbors
than zombies, and they tend to keep the vampire population down.
__________________________________________________________________
pgpthWCplitmn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home