WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] xenoprof (xen)

To: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] xenoprof (xen)
From: "Santos, Jose Renato G" <joserenato.santos@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:05:19 -0800
Cc: "Turner, Yoshio" <yoshio_turner@xxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jose Renato Santos <jsantos@xxxxxxxxxx>, G John Janakiraman <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:08:10 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcXoPt+ITofF0z4VQtOimgpAV+KKdQAP5U4QAAIlBDAACO5NUA==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] xenoprof (xen)
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 11:24 AM
> To: Santos, Jose Renato G; Keir Fraser
> Cc: Turner, Yoshio; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jose 
> Renato Santos; G John Janakiraman; ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] xenoprof (xen)
> 
> > Is there anything I can do to make your job easier?
> > Would you like to receive multiple smaller patches (one patch per 
> > file)?
> 
> I think we should hold-off applying the linux patches to the 
> sparse tree for the moment for a couple of reasons: John 
> Levon would like to see some cleanups, and I think we'll be 
> better off applying once the sparse tree has moved to 2.6.14 
> anyhow (generated from the merge tree).
> 

  Ok, Ian
  Just a clarification. The cleanups suggested by John Levon,
  are for the user level tools and for the modifications on the
  generic code of Oprofile in "drivers/oprofile". Both of
  these patches are not expected to go into the sparse tree,
  anyhow. I was expecting that only the changes to "arch/xen/oprofile"
  would go to the sparse tree. There is no cleanups suggested
  by John Levon for this patch. 

  From your message, I am assuming that you are agreeing to include the
  "arch/xen/oprofile" modifications into the sparse tree when
  it moves to the 2.6.14 (please, correct it if I am wrong).
  Any expectation of when this should happen? 
 
  In the mean time, I will be working on the cleanups suggested
  by John for the user level tools and for generic Oprofile code
  modifications.
 
> Jose: please could you have a go generating the patch against 
> the linux-2.6-xen.hg tree.
> 
  Forgive me, but I am not sure I understand what you mean in this
  sentence. Could you please clarify ...

  Thanks

  Renato

> Thanks,
> Ian
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel