xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][XM-TEST] Fix test 04_block_attach

from [Ewan Mellor]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	Dan Smith <danms@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][XM-TEST] Fix test 04_block_attach
From:	Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:26:07 +0000
Cc:	Xen Developers <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:26:19 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<8764qznhts.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<8764qznhts.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.9i

On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:46:23AM -0800, Dan Smith wrote:

> Now that this test fails for the right reason, another bug is
> revealed: #397.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Smith <danms@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> # HG changeset patch
> # User dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> # Node ID 469dddcc907d0b79589c3e465cd59024acce9daf
> # Parent  e912f2e9b755bf8ce7d798867b3678759fa0df85
> This test was failing for he wrong reason.  Calls to block-attach after the
> first *should* report failure, so the test should not fail because of this.  
> The test now fails because multiple calls to block-attach seem to detach the
> block devicem, which is wrong.

Applied, thanks.

Ewan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH][XM-TEST] Fix test 04_block_attach, Dan Smith Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][XM-TEST] Fix test 04_block_attach, Ewan Mellor <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix bootloader run with domaininfo changes [RESEND], Jeremy Katz
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add more details to xm.1 man page, Ewan Mellor
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH][XM-TEST] Fix test 04_block_attach, Dan Smith
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] "xm mem-max" problem on PAE xenlinux, Nakajima, Jun
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]