Re: [Xen-devel] Solaris dom0 (was "Makefile reworking")

On Monday 07 November 2005 09:18, John Levon wrote:
> This is initial work towards a Solaris Domain 0. For that we most
> definitely want the tools and Xen itself compiling (and eventually,
> working) on Solaris. We could maintain this as a permanent fork, but
> that has all the disadvantages a fork usually does.

In that case, the mingling of threads and signals in xenstored (see "Make 
xenstored reopen its trace file on SIGHUP") may not be a good idea. I think 
that behavior varies across operating systems...

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Makefile reworking, John Levon Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Makefile reworking, Keir Fraser Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Makefile reworking, John Levon Re: [Xen-devel] Solaris dom0 (was "Makefile reworking"), Hollis Blanchard <=

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] Please pull xen-ia64-unstable, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] clock skew, Gabor HALASZ

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Makefile reworking, John Levon

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Change the vmx mmio handler to static, Jiang, Yunhong

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]