|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH][VT] Multithread IDE device model ( was: RE:[Xen-d
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 27 Oct 2005, at 15:18, Dong, Eddie wrote:
>
>> So, I think we can stick with current situation now, and revist
>> later when we rebase Qemu.
>
> I think any damage is now done with regards to keeping tools/ioemu in
> sync with qemu, so we may as well take this patch.
This particular patch is very small and cleanly contained by #ifdef
DMA_MULTI_THREAD. In a sense it's disposable, and it won't stand out as
deviation from qemu.
>
> At some point there will be a big restructuring of the device model
> code (moving out of dom0) and rebasing to qemu then is probably a good
> plan. If some of the changes we've made could have been pushed up to
> qemu that would have been good -- perhaps we can enforce something
> like that after a rebase.
>
> -- Keir
>
I agree.
Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH][VT] Multithread IDE device model ( was: RE:[Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make IDE dma tranfer run in another thread inqemu),
Nakajima, Jun <=
|
|
|
|
|