WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] monolithic versus modules

To: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] monolithic versus modules
From: Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:43:01 -0400
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:40:12 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I spun a new xen kernel from pristine sources using modules, had the
APCI errors and scsi timeouts.

I took pristine source and spun a monolithic kernel and everything
appears to be working.


gcc version 3.4.4 20050721 (Red Hat 3.4.4-2)
if it matter.

xen_changeset  : Wed Oct 26 11:59:13 2005 +0100 7500:20d1a79ebe31

I have had this APCI issue on this SMP Athlon with modules for a while
now.

Guess I will stick with monolithic kernels for xen for now.


Regards,
Ted


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>