 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] getting mini-os to compile again
| To: | Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] getting mini-os to compile again |
| From: | Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:45:50 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:37:51 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20051025093905.GC5660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <20051025093905.GC5660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 25 Oct 2005, at 10:39, Simon Kagstrom wrote: I've created a patch to get the mini-os to compile in Xen-unstable. The patch is pretty big, but this is mostly because I've replaced hypervisor.h with thehypercalls.h header file from Linux (which seems easier to maintain anyway). I've ignored X86_64. Thanks! I also had to disable some code in mini-os/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c sinceXS_WATCH_ACK is no longer available, I'm not sure what the proper fix wouldbe. I haven;t looked, but I think xenbus_xs.c is pretty OS-agnostic and the one in minios is probably straight out of linux-2.6-xen-sparse? So a starting point woul dbe to take a fresh snap from the linux sparse tree and make it build. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][VT] Multithread IDE device model ( was: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make IDE dma tranfer run in another thread inqemu), Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] Lets not put statements with side-effects inside BUG_ON(), Muli Ben-Yehuda |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] getting mini-os to compile again, Simon Kagstrom |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] xm destroy does not cleanup vbd, Kurt Garloff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
