xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] dom0_shadow=1

from [Gerd Knorr]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] dom0_shadow=1
From:	Gerd Knorr <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:31:09 +0200
Delivery-date:	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:28:25 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4358E999.8070100@xxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<4358E999.8070100@xxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050715)

Hi,

Is this supposed to work?

Oh, and btw, trying to use the "new" shadow code for 32bit non-paedoesn't even compile. Is nobody testing that? Wasn't the plan to usethe new code everythere some day? What is the status of that?


cheers,

  Gerd

--- a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile     Wed Oct 19 10:53:00 2005
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile     Fri Oct 21 16:24:46 2005
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
  ifneq ($(pae),n)
   OBJS += shadow.o shadow_public.o     # x86_32p: new code
  else
-  OBJS += shadow32.o                   # x86_32: old code
+  OBJS += shadow.o shadow_public.o     # x86_32: new code
+#  OBJS += shadow32.o                  # x86_32: old code
  endif
 endif

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] dom0_shadow=1, Gerd Knorr Re: [Xen-devel] dom0_shadow=1, Gerd Knorr <= RE: [Xen-devel] dom0_shadow=1, Nakajima, Jun RE: [Xen-devel] dom0_shadow=1, Ian Pratt

Previous by Date:	RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 and Pacifica, Petersson, Mats
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix bugzilla 89 x86_64 linux won't boot on hardware with sata drives, Ryan Harper
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] dom0_shadow=1, Gerd Knorr
Next by Thread:	RE: [Xen-devel] dom0_shadow=1, Nakajima, Jun
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]