|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation
I would like to run multiple copies of an application on a PC with
multiple remote dumb clients.
Sounds like something better handled with LTSA, VNC or NX.
VNC just provides remote access to the main keyboard / mouse queue and
the transmission of the display.
I already have a solution for remote access but my problems are:
- I want to have several copies of an application running, each with a
remote user. How do I pass the keyboard / mouse data to the right
application if there is only one Windows message queue?
- on start up an application normally checks to see if a copy of itself
is already running and if it is, it stops loading itself.
If the NX you are referring to is Linux terminal server then that's no
use because:
- it doesn't solve the two problems I mentioned above
- it is a Linux product and as I previously said, I need a solution with
Windows XP.
I don't know LTSA can you give me a URL?
With unix you can native run several copies of the same application at
the same time. With X11 you can even do so from multiple locations.
Fine, but as I said, I need a solution for Windows XP.
Xen however is very useful for running the domain that might serve
such applications.
Well that was my original question. As I understand it, Xen has been
designed to act as an encapsulation of the OS so that several copies /
versions of OS can be run. But it seems a waste of memory (and licence
fee?) if I need a complete copy of Windows XP for each copy of the
application I want to run. I was wondering whether Xen, or a part of Xen
could run on top of Windows XP to encapsulate just the application
instead, so that I could run multiple copies of the application but just
one copy of the OS.
g.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation, graham
- Re: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation, Nicholas Lee
- Re: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation,
graham <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation, Nicholas Lee
- Re: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation, Mark Williamson
- Re: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation, John Levin
- Re: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation, Kip Macy
- Re: [Xen-devel] App virtualisation, not OS virtualisation, graham
|
|
|
|
|