On 20 Oct 2005, at 16:24, Ryan Harper wrote:
Are you interested in any modification of the cpumap to list
conversion?
Or is it ok if vcpu-list shows a long list of integers?
I think an ordered list of cpus is most user-friendly, perhaps using
range notation to keep it short (so, for example, mask 0x77 would print
as '0-2, 4-6' rather than '0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6'). A mask is a more
succinct representation but maybe not so good for users. :-)
I would think mapping cpu % nr_cpus, throwing away duplicates would be
best. With [0,1,2,3] and nr_cpus=2, cpumap would be [0,1].
I think Xen should ignore non-existent cpus in a cpumap. I'm not really
fussed what you do with them in xend -- ignoring them there too would
probably make most sense.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home