WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] peth1: received packet with own address as source addres

To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] peth1: received packet with own address as source address
From: David F Barrera <dfbp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:44:01 -0500
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Schmitter <arnd_xen@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:41:20 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <43540A2A.2000101@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1129574685.6253.20.camel@dbarrera_tp> <4353F277.3080703@xxxxxxxx> <1129580110.6252.28.camel@dbarrera_tp> <43540A2A.2000101@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 15:31 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> David F Barrera wrote:
> 
> >Arnd, thanks for your response. My network configuration appears to be
> >OK; it is simple, one NIC and its IP address, and everything seems to be
> >working well. Also, there are no two machines with the same address. So,
> >I am wondering if this is a problem with Xen. I have opened up a
> >bugzilla report, as I would like to have a definitive answer as to
> >whether this is a bug or a network configuration issue.
> >  
> >
> There's at least 3 other people seeing this with snapshots as far back 
> as 20050810.
Yes, I've been seeing this problem for some time now. 
> 
> Are you seeing this on a RHEL or Fedora system?

RHEL 4, SLES 9 SP2, and FC4 on both x86 and x86_64.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori
> 
> >http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=339
> >  
> >
> >>Arnd
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>    
> >>            
> >>___________________________________________________________ 
> >>Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier 
> >>anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Xen-devel mailing list
> >>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>