WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] SMP and VCPU migration.

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP and VCPU migration.
From: Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:20:25 +0200
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:14:52 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5
Hi,

I am working on SMP for xen-ia64.  The first step was to be able to use all 
the cpus but without considering VCPUs migration ie VCPU must be pinned to 
one CPU.

Is it the same policy on x86 ?

The migration cost is rather high on ia64 and may require a lot of inter-CPU 
traffic for coherency (TLB and cache management at least).  What about x86 ?
How is the wbinvd instruction paravirualized/virtualized ?

Thank you for your comments.
Tristan.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>