RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix NAT for domU checksum offload

To:	"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jon Mason" <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix NAT for domU checksum offload
From:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:31:25 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:28:52 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcXRWrF/QQuzj3adRqeYK1Nd61dEVwAD/ujw
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix NAT for domU checksum offload

 > > I added the patch to the already existing "net-csum.patch", as it 
> > seemed to be the right fit.
> 
> I've applied the patch to the patch, but we should bear in 
> mind that this will break non-Xen builds. If this were to be 
> pushed upstream then we'd need to send up some of the 
> csum_blank/csum_valid logic also.

Good point. The patch needs to be made self-contained, and will
interfere with the merge work as is.

It might be best to keep this as a second patch applied after the first
in the meantime.

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix NAT for domU checksum offload