|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] network-bridge script support for multipleextern
Ian Pratt wrote:
The attached patch allows the network-bridge script to be
used to generate multiple bridges corresponding to different
physical interfaces. It adds a new parameter, "virtnum", used
to refer both to the loopback interface to be used and to set
defaults regarding the physical interface and bridge name.
Thus, if one wishes to start xen-br0 on eth0 and xen-br1 on
eth1, one need only call:
network-bridge start ## virtnum is 0 by default
network-bridge start virtnum=1
We need a way of controlling the set of paramters that network-bridge is
invoked with from xend-config.sxp. I'd be inclined just to list the
whole command line.
You mean list the whole command line when you display what parameters
you were called with? Only issue with that is that it doesn't show what
we defaulted to, presuming that we did any defaulting. Or do you mean
listing all the parameters during invocation? I pretty much do that
myself -- I actually use it as follows:
network-bridge start bridge=xenbr1 netdev=eth1 virtnum=1
...however, having reasonable defaults for parameters the user chooses
not to supply is a Good Thing.
I'm not sure I like the idea of specifying 'virtnum'.
What would you do instead? Search for the first veth* that isn't up?
Can't say I like that as much.
Note, btw, that I *am* assuming that network-bridge gets called multiple
times -- if you want both xen-br0 and xen-br1 on eth0 and eth1 as in my
example above, you need two calls.
I think it might be better to be able to tell xend to invoke the script
multiple times e.g. :
(network-script "network-bridge netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0;
network-bridge netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1")
...and need to have the script search for the veth* and vif* devices
itself, or base their names on the number appended to the netdev device?
I don't really like that.
xend will need to insert "start"/"stop" into these lines as appropriate.
Possibly we should modify the scripts to take foo=bar parameters before
or after the start/stop command.
NB: Note that I'm using xenbr0 rather than xen-br0. We need to remove
the hyphen as it plays havoc with certain vendor's scripts.
Yes; I use xenbr0/xenbr1 myself, but did "xen-br*" for the patch so that
it doesn't do more than one thing.
What do you think? Could you knock up a patch?
We probably ought to come to a decision on behaviour first.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|