[Xen-devel] [PATCH][VT] IO packet state STATE_REQ_READY fix

To:	"xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH][VT] IO packet state STATE_REQ_READY fix
From:	"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:08:36 +0800
Delivery-date:	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 05:06:04 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcXNQSH8qrG2PrhmR9qVqou+JfwB9QCcfHRA
Thread-topic:	[PATCH][VT] IO packet state STATE_REQ_READY fix

Currently, we mark an IO request to STATE_IOREQ_READY state before
calling
IO handlers in xen HV, i.e. vmx_portio_intercept or vmx_mmio_intercept.
Actually, STATE_IOREQ_READY means it's ready for DM handling, only if IO
handlers in xen HV won't handle it, it should be passed to DM. This
patch
fixes this issue.

Signed-off-by: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nakajima Jun <nakajima.jun@xxxxxxxxx>

io_ready.patch
Description: io_ready.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH][VT] IO packet state STATE_REQ_READY fix