|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Deletion of 2.4 Linux sparse tree
> Failing that, how will a kernel in a VMX domain see hardware? Would the
> kernel need specific device drivers?
It'd need the drivers for the emulated hardware... It wouldn't *have to* have
Xen-aware drivers.
> Would a Linux dom0 and a SCO domU cause a matter-antimatter-like
> explosion? :)
You might need to use the "xm litigate" command
Cheers,
Mark
> James
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
> > Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:54
> > To: xen-devel List
> > Subject: [Xen-devel] Deletion of 2.4 Linux sparse tree
> >
> > The linux 2.4 sparse tree has been broken for a long time now, and it
> > is unlikely ever to be fixed. Unless anyone wants to volunteer to
> > maintain the tree, I plan to delete it from the repository in the next
> > day or so.
> >
> > -- Keir
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|