RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VT] SMP VMX guest AP bring up need call

To:	"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VT] SMP VMX guest AP bring up need calldo_boot_vcpu in hypervisor
From:	"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 3 Oct 2005 21:13:48 +0800
Delivery-date:	Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:11:28 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcXEgd7m9cvPRxVcSk+fcsS8QJnOxQASJe4wANKLJ/A=
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VT] SMP VMX guest AP bring up need calldo_boot_vcpu in hypervisor

Hi Keir, this patch changes common code of xen hypervisor, but seems we
have to, because current call to do_boot_vcpu is always from domains,
however, for SMP VMX guest AP bring up, we need call it from xen
hypervisor,
so we'd like to split it.
What's your opinion?

split_do_boot_vcpu.patch
Description: split_do_boot_vcpu.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VT] SMP VMX guest AP bring up need calldo_boot_