| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Add sequence number to 'xm info'
IP> I guess for trees that are direct clones of xenbits with no local
IP> modifications then the short id is meaningful. Such trees are
IP> probably in the majority.
Indeed. Additionally, people who are testing xen on all of their
systems will most likely be doing so with a real clone of the repo,
and not one with a bunch of random patches, I would think.
IP> I guess it doesn't really hurt providing people know what they're
IP> doing.
I think the people who don't know what they're doing won't know that
it's not part of the larger changeset ID, which means they'll copy the
whole thing when posting a bug, which gets the info there anyway.
Would it be better to tuck the sequence number away somewhere else? I
think that would be a bit overkill, but if anyone has strong feelings
about it, I can do it. Perhaps adding "xen_build" to "xen_major" and
"xen_minor"?
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home