WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?
From: David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:31:37 +0100
Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:29:13 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1127805345.7703.107.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <152436486e4a36af94a87ad6d40a768e@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1127354853.7567.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b5423e9d922e98b290db80ff4d0cba9c@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1127429689.2722.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <785f15905bfe17d87d6bd0eb878cc166@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1127618982.796.71.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <39daa0554066842da8701a90d9f01386@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4318f53c57216e19ba81c096b4a0c849@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050925185529.GW9610@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1127716571.9596.50.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050926185158.GF10661@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1127805345.7703.107.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:51 +0100, Christian Limpach wrote:
>>On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 04:36:11PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>Before I reply to the rest of your comments, I'd like to point out that
>>I don't agree with your assumption that we can delay suspend/resume
>>until we're outside of a transaction.  This seems to be the fundamental
>>difference driving different solutions.
> 
> Absolutely.  The delays will be immeasurably short.

What about denial of service (intentional or due to bugs in guest OSes/tools)?

-- 
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel