WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] make mkpatches

To: "Chris Wright" <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] make mkpatches
From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:38:36 +1000
Cc: Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 01:36:21 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcW/2p7OBvNnwBDHSXm6Y/ZjurtwIQABL1Lw
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] make mkpatches
> 
> Sounds like you're not picking up the patches that get applied to the
> base tree from patches/linux-2.6.12/  (btw, the smp_alts.patch won't
> compile on plain x86, it's missing a trivial fix).

That sounds plausible. I assumed that mkpatches would do this. Should I
apply these patches/linux-2.6.12/* before or after applying the
mkpatches-generated patch?

Thanks

James

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>