WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-tools] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make xend reject duplicates and

To: Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-tools] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make xend reject duplicates and rename zombies
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:37:23 -0500
Cc: Xen Tools Developers <xen-tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Developers <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:35:07 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3d8eece205091612523cf7b900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-tools-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen control tools developers <xen-tools.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-tools@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-tools>, <mailto:xen-tools-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-tools>, <mailto:xen-tools-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <87br2uz5yj.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <4329C366.2070006@xxxxxxxxxx> <3d8eece205091612523cf7b900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-tools-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050912)
Christian Limpach wrote:

On 9/15/05, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think this is not the right solution to the problem at hand.  The
problem stems from the fact that xm destroy is just a call to
xc_domain_destroy which is really just a request to the hypervisor to
destroy the domain.

Indeed.

Therefore, there is a race condition if you assume that the domain is
dead after xm destroy returns.  This patch renames the domain name which
prevents a name class but does not solve the general problem.  Consider,
for instance, if a domain is using a block device and you do an xm
destroy.  It is not safe to create a new domain with that same block
device until you know that the previously mentioned domain is gone.

I think renaming would make sense if a domain is crashed.  You might
want to keep the domain around to attach a debugger to it but at the
same time restart a fresh copy as soon as possible.
As long as you can make sure to rename *after* all of the devices have been properly torn down.

Otherwise, we need to make sure to make it well known that restarting a domain after a crash can result in very bad things :-)

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

This patch would allow:
xm destroy xmexample1 && xm create /etc/xen/xmexample1

I think the right solution is to make xm destroy not return until the
domain has actually gone away and add a flag to xm destroy to return
immediately if that behavior is ever desired.

Sounds good.

I'll work up a patch tonight after class.

Thanks!

    christian



_______________________________________________
Xen-tools mailing list
Xen-tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-tools