WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?

To: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?
From: Christian Limpach <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:55:07 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:52:55 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eFQ3itiqYhRxmrEPPBzyvlLfp/uLRV5XwweU9hABR9vyEU6hj1TsFuOpCL5Glnv0ypEbzQMAUAuI/Cro060gNAhokZCv9b4xu7JzTlHEdTG2hF02GBhkrT0mLYWuWQYkPVXB9QJ1EyvwY3+ZJOYHtwyl3udTr2zMEW8Vu+H7R7o=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1126689530.4415.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5d7aca9505090801025f3d5771@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3d8eece205090803381b818f18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1126226609.25110.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3d8eece205091302422ac74f77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1126657264.7896.20.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1126689530.4415.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 9/14/05, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Patch for reading only (I subbed in NULL for the default store page for
> the moment, since I know there's another patch out there which touches
> this).

I really don't think that the multi-page approach is good and it's
also orthogonal, i.e. we could have multiple connections but still
want concurrent transactions on the same connection.  What's wrong
with concurrent transactions on the same connection?

    christian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel