WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] virtualGraphicCards

> So, dom0 sees the real graphics card, and attaches to it.
> Xen offers virtual graphics cards for each domU. domU_2 does not fire
> up a graphical system, thus works with the emulated text buffer.
> domU_1 fires up its graphical system. Both domU write some data to
> some place, managed by Xen (because Xen offered the vGraphicscard).

> 1.) Is the data actually saved as the domUs wrote them? Or is some
> glue-layer in-between, converting it to .e.g VNC-compatible data, to
> make the memory consumption problem go away?
I think it quite likely that each domain gets its own little framebuffer
in memory.

> Anyway, if the dom0 wants to "see" any of domU, it just asks Xen for
> the data, getting a pointer or something (it just reads, anyway). It
> is best if we can interact with the domUs, so we get some virtual HIDs
> (Human Interface Devices)? Anyway the data is accessed, either in a
> "raw" way or through some "protocol" like VNC.
Makes sense.

> Still, I don't see why any of the displaying systems, in the bottom
> (dom0 graphical system and/or Xen) or the top (domU graphical
> systems), and their transporting systems, should be known; In the end,
> all of those systems transfer data to a graphic card, in a standard
> way (VGA for instance), no matter if it is a linux framebuffer, a Unix
> x11, a Plan9 Rio, or any other system.
Exactly, so you support the first option Mark mentioned. The second
option is that we shift the boundary higher up than that: the domU just
has a special X driver that, instead of writing the data to a gfx card,
packages it up in whatever way for the backend driver in dom0 to look at
later. This is probably an easier way to do it -- we only have to
interface to X calls, rather than having to pretend to be a whole
graphics card, with VESA and everything -- but strikes me as being
almost cripplingly platform-specific.

This is still some way off, though, so everything is up in the air.

-- 
  ,^--^.      ,-----.      Never meddle in the affairs of angry cats,   
 ( +  + )-----   ---'      for they are well-armed and quick to bite.   
 /  --          )          http://surreal.istic.org/   keyid 885b170d   
|_,-|_/--,_|-\_|    I'm not complaining; I'm just commenting negatively.

Attachment: pgpqrOgEGTAFK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>