| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] New console transport and update xencons
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:01:08PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Why are we listening for virq? The polling method used before is
> considerably more robust. The virq's aren't always delivered on domain
> destruction (they are only delivered if a domain crashes or is shutdown).
That would be a bug then, when does it happen?
> Moreover, I thought the overriding goal of this was to get rid of xcs?
> Why are we still using it?
Because we haven't switched virq delivery over to use the store.
> Also, there's a number of errors that this code introduces (changing
> things to use asprintf and not checking for OOM conditions). It would
> have been nice if this went to the list first so we could comment on it.
> I'll submit some cleanup patches later today...
Thanks, looking forward to those patches!
christian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home