|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ range in domain 0
Something to do with APIC (Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller) I
think. Here's the output of one system...
CPU0
0: 2548267677 local-APIC-edge timer
1: 16419 IO-APIC-edge i8042
9: 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
11: 211183161 IO-APIC-level ohci_hcd
14: 2 IO-APIC-edge ide2
169: 230697393 IO-APIC-level ide0, ide1
177: 247537790 IO-APIC-level eth0
201: 63 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx
209: 185403163 IO-APIC-level eth1
217: 126336295 IO-APIC-level eth2
NMI: 0
LOC: 2549847962
ERR: 58866
MIS: 0
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Que
> Sent: Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:13
> To: Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-devel] IRQ range in domain 0
>
> Hello,
> I am running Xen-Unstable on intel x386 , with one CPU ; When
running
> cat /proc/interrupts on Domain 0 I see the following:
>
> CPU0
> 1: 1424 Phys-irq i8042
> 9: 0 Phys-irq acpi
> 14: 421055 Phys-irq ide0
> 15: 16 Phys-irq ide1
> 17: 4419 Phys-irq eth0
> 20: 10884 Phys-irq ohci_hcd:usb1
> 21: 0 Phys-irq ohci_hcd:usb2
> 256: 0 Dynamic-irq ctrl-if
> 257: 77411 Dynamic-irq timer0
> 258: 0 Dynamic-irq console
> 259: 0 Dynamic-irq net-be-dbg
> NMI: 0
> LOC: 0
> ERR: 0
> MIS: 0
>
> can I deduce from this that the number of available physical IRQ is
> higher than 15?
> What is strange to me is that on an ordinary linux kernel (not a
> xen-patched kernel ) , there can be up to 15 interrupts,and in all
> cases I know, they are in the range 0-14.
> I don't remeber I saw a phiyscal interrupt whose number is higher than
14
> on a standard x386 platform.
>
> Also according to "Unerstanding the Linux Kernel" book,chapter 4:
> "Tradional PICs are implemented by connecting "in cascade" two
> 8259A-style external chips.Each chip can handle up to eight different
> IRQ input lines. Since the INT output line of the slave PIC is
> connected to the IRQ2 pin of the master PIC, the number of available
> IRQ lines is limited to 15."
>
>
> Any ideas?
> Regards
> John Que.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|