WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] x86_64 DOM0 SMP oops

To: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] x86_64 DOM0 SMP oops
From: Ryan Harper <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:15:00 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:13:41 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050822191254.GM7901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20050822185220.GH5523@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050822191254.GM7901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
* Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx> [2005-08-22 14:13]:
> * Ryan Harper (ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > While working/testing the hotplug patch for x86_64, I encountered an
> > [1]oops.  When the system was idle or minor load, I didn't have any
> > problems, but as I kicked off an parallel build of the kernel, I hit the
> > oops.  
> > 
> > changeset:   6315:531ad4bde8f249c318588f41bdbb72d0b0e0ea9c
> > tag:         tip
> > parent:      6314:473af43ac65b1a872b058469d01acc6cfa21505d
> > parent:      6313:d8fd24b4308078f6d20aa8a306e540c5833ca5a2
> > user:        cl349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > date:        Mon Aug 22 05:21:18 2005
> > summary:     merge?
> > 
> > 1. 
> > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000001c RIP:
> > <ffffffff80112c1a>{retint_kernel+0}
> > PGD aae067 PUD aaf067 PMD 0
> > Oops: 0000 [1] PREEMPT SMP
> 
> Not surprising, w/ PREEMPT.  Is it stable w/out PREEMPT?

Really?  I thought CONFIG_PREEMPT was tested since it was on for x86_32
SMP.  I'll give that a shot and let you know.

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>