WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Domain0/Domain 1 and ring1 (x86) - tracing question

To: "John Que" <qwejohn@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Domain0/Domain 1 and ring1 (x86) - tracing question
From: "Petersson, Mats" <mats.petersson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:39:31 +0200
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:45:46 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcWj3oOkqWKWAS0hQR2xh993ZAx/pQAAZURg
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Domain0/Domain 1 and ring1 (x86) - tracing question
How about:

Arch/x86/domain.c: new_thread(). 

That function is called from arch/x86/domain_build.c when building dom0,


I can't help you with tracing the domU build at the moment (I've got a
job to do... ;-). Myabe someone else can pipe in with some more info.

--
Mats

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Que [mailto:qwejohn@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 18 August 2005 11:28
> To: Petersson, Mats
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Domain0/Domain 1 and ring1 (x86) - 
> tracing question
> 
> Hello ,
> Does anybody knows the answer/any hint to my question  ? 
> Any ideas ,  someone? 
> 
> Regards,
> John
> 
> On 8/16/05, John Que <qwejohn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Thanks !
> > 
> > This makes clear things a bit.
> > 
> > However, I had grepped under the linux-2.6-xen-sparse tree and saw 
> > only one occurrence of  BOOT_CS , in that 
> > linux-2.6-xen-sparse/include/asm-xen/asm-i386/segment.h.
> > 
> > I had also grepped under the "xen" (hypervisor) subtree and did not 
> > find and also under linux-2.6.12-xen0/arch/xen and did not find any 
> > occurrence of  BOOT_CS.
> > 
> > (There is of course in 
> linux-2.6.12-xen0/arch/xen/i386/boot/setup.S , 
> > but this seems unrelevant in our case).
> > 
> > I am probably missing something;
> >  Any ideas ?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > John
> > 
> > On 8/16/05, Petersson, Mats <mats.petersson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > There's a #define in arch-x86_32.h that defines 
> FLAT_KERNEL_[CDS]S 
> > > to FLAT_RING1_[CDS]S. FLAT_RING1_[CDS]S is the entry in GDT for a 
> > > CPL=1 (ring 1) code/data/stack[1] segment selector.
> > > It is then used in various places to set up the registers used by 
> > > the actual kernel, for example the file 
> > > linux-2.6-xen-sparse/include/asm-xen/asm-i386/segment.h 
> is using the 
> > > KERNEL_CS to give the BOOT_CS to the Linux kernel.
> > >
> > > [1] Stack segment is actually using the same selector as the data 
> > > segment.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mats
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of John 
> > > > Que
> > > > Sent: 16 August 2005 11:59
> > > > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: [Xen-devel] Domain0/Domain 1 and ring1 (x86) - tracing 
> > > > question
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > As I understand the Hypervisor should run in Ring 0 of the
> > > > x86 , and the domains (Domain0 and DomainU) should work 
> in Ring 1.
> > > >
> > > > I was a bit curious where in the code this assiging of 
> Ring 0 to 
> > > > Xen and Ring 1 to dom0/domU is done ?
> > > > I had tried to look under arch/xen/i386 and didn't find.
> > > >
> > > > Is it in the assembler *.S files ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel