WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] supporting non-NX/XD capable processors on x86_6

To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] supporting non-NX/XD capable processors on x86_64 xenlinux
From: Jerone Young <jerone@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:43:32 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:41:44 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NxGqSR1CXJ/2fuqTCDlHsozymS8OtdCO/KdMEGJLwAE/EmIGTaCoyfWeZdaq6WBe9mvMvH8dDPBbKkTR3krrE3ExZ/d8sQgHLSmltBorveYNEbTjhu+qZODknTJdEnUT4wmeSxBn60cxkRadquszrMEx6b11xpl7CJgvAl/Kjqw=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304E65827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304E65827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is identical to the patch Scott Parish sent awhile back. Jun you
said that this was not a good way of going about fixing this (actually
it was kind of toward another problem ...but I think we were also
trying to get x86-64 xen to just boot at the time). I guess this is
the best way then?

On 8/17/05, Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I remember some people complained that x86_64 xenlinux failed to boot on
> the systems with processor(s) that does not NX/XD. The patch should fix
> the problem as far as I tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Jun
> ---
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel