This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] tidy up requested

To: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] tidy up requested
From: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:46:06 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:47:18 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <42FA8777.7000106@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1E2tgW-0006vl-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200508102321.49800.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <42FA8777.7000106@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.8.2
> So I can not convince you to allow multiple versions of xen on one machine?
> People who are using 2.0 and porting to 3.0 (like me and newsham and
> ...) could sure use that setup!

Personally I think it'd be nice to have - I'm with you on that.  I'm not sure 
it's critical right now *but* it's worth considering for the long term for 
users testing future versions of Xen - even though 3.0 will (obviously ;-) be 
great and make everyone want to upgrade, it's going to get annoying for IT 
folks who really do want to test multiple versions.


Xen-devel mailing list