This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Make xend start launch XenStore

To: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Make xend start launch XenStore
From: Nivedita Singhvi <nsnix@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:01:46 -0700
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:00:27 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1123206486.10802.45.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <42F23CD3.8090907@xxxxxxxxxx> <1123206486.10802.45.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020)
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 11:05 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:

The following patch makes tools/misc/xend start up the XenStore. It would be nicer to use init.d scripts to do this sort of stuff but this works for now.

Perhaps a xend debugging switch we can turn on now and turn off closer
to release?

It'd be nice to have xenstored run with --trace-file=...

I think this is a good idea.

And I'd even recommend turning xen debug on by default for the next
month or so (I seriously doubt anyone is running current xen-unstable
in a production environment - ??).

Here are the current defaults, as seen in xen/Rules.mk:

verbose     ?= n
debug       ?= n
perfc       ?= n
perfc_arrays?= n
trace       ?= n
optimize    ?= y
domu_debug  ?= n
crash_debug ?= n

Would anyone else agree to:

verbose     ?= n
debug       ?= y
perfc       ?= n
perfc_arrays?= n
trace       ?= y
optimize    ?= y
domu_debug  ?= y
crash_debug ?= y


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>