| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes
> > In fact, are network and block the right nouns?
> > Would vblock/vnetif be better?
>
> It seems to me that network and block are known concepts, and the user is
> already in a virtual control environment, so the "virtual" part should be
> implied by the fact that you are running xm in the first place. So I would
> lean towards network or netif and block directly without the "v". However,
> I don't feel all that strongly about it, so whatever you like there is
> fine.
I'm inclined to agree with you here; as long as we don't ever have xm doing
any non-virtual things it should be unambiguous. Even then, we could use a
"p" prefix (or similar) to denote physical ops in preference.
Cheers,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home