Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Fix NX/XD enable on secondar

On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:52:27AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> 
> Does EFER_NX need setting for 32-bit PAE?
> 
> We don't set it for *any* cpus in x86_32 builds, even cpu0...

The Dom0 linux kernel probably does for CPU #0 ...

> >  (XEN) (file=traps.c, line=872) Non-priv domain attempted 
> >RDMSR(c0000080,00000000,20100000).
> >  (XEN) (file=traps.c, line=864) Non-priv domain attempted 
> >WRMSR(c0000080,00000800,00000000).

... what the DomU kernel isn't allowed to do on CPU #1.

  Gerd

-- 
panic("it works"); /* avoid being flooded with debug messages */

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Fix NX/XD enable on secondary CPUs., Gerd Knorr Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Fix NX/XD enable on secondary CPUs., Keir Fraser Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Fix NX/XD enable on secondary CPUs., Gerd Knorr <=

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Fix NX/XD enable on secondary CPUs., Petersson, Mats

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] small fix to x86_64 xenlinux config file, Li, Xin B

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Fix NX/XD enable on secondary CPUs., Keir Fraser

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] Why have an idle domain? (Was: IDLE domain is scheduledmore than dom0), Ian Pratt

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]