 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm --version
| To: | Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm --version |
| From: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:57:57 +0900 |
| Cc: | Xen Dev <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:57:07 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tvfliOuAalUJhCJd7A2dKSiS9I6OOM2YE04Mi1rVkXa4Y03tZhlP0Y6VtTHv1wIcdXnSc1F8HUrhe+MRXGu1QPnxQ5jwFIRSzu/TiJUpvf+ba+MFJoCox2L1ep4nfCZnTSIrwd5VSs8b1+gHnuNPGsAycO5MV74tIqo7199XgZw= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D282144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D282144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 6/9/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > can you confirm that ht_per_core is also wrongly set? it is > > set (=1) at arch/x86/setup.c or arch/ia64/smpboot.c, but > > never changed. but this variable is used somewhere, and got > > reported in "xm info", for example. > > > > so all of its usage are also wrong when we use HT? (because > > in that case ht_per_core must be 2) > > OK, that's bad -- the code that initialised ht_per_core has also gone. > > What we need to do is to take the new code from Linux 2.6.12-rc5 that > understands multicore, and correctly initialise ht_per_core and > core_per_socket. We can hardwire socket_per_node=1 for the moment. > anybody is working on this? if no, i will take it. regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 Xend loses network - eth0 -> veth0?, Jurgen Stroo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] PAE patches / hypercall interface changes, Gerd Knorr |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm --version, Ian Pratt |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-users] Re: kernel oops/IRQ exception when networking between many domUs, Birger Toedtmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
