 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Parallax or LVM?
| To: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Parallax or LVM? |
| From: | Andrew Warfield <andrew.warfield@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:16:04 +0100 |
| Cc: | Xen Dev <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:15:18 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jq/Q00i/ZWIoFlhG8ys0J/NQFczJMBFKE87obXodYJqjgWarB1Px3AS6T8Uv8mg8GliHeEcigT55fkewoCo5S8X5kQHczOXRsLKFF/V/tur0tVw5Ayi/iYnV+hP7bQ0dj7VXfgSr3gpR8yMTsOi8IeZ5NDpyhKPBYLvd8NaskYo= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <9cde8bff0506081052e1afcb8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <9cde8bff0506081052e1afcb8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | andrew.warfield@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi aq, the parallax code is in unstable and does do cow. It's been undergoing a bunch of rewrites over the past month and will likely continue to be unstable for the immediate future. If you want to play with it, there is a readme in the /tools/blktap directory that should be fairly accurate, and I'm happy to track down any bugs that you turn up. That said, if you can wait until the end of the week, I'll be checking in a few fixes that should make it a bit more pleasant to work with. ;) a. On 6/8/05, aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > hello, > > Parallax is in -unstable short time ago. So in the future we can do > CoW using it, provided it is stable enough. Should I still use LVM? > > regards, > aq > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] wget and Zope crashes on post-2.0.6 -testing, Ian Pratt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] PAE patches / hypercall interface changes, Gerd Knorr |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Parallax or LVM?, aq |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Parallax or LVM?, aq |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
