|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xenoprof patches for xen-unstable
Andrew,
Could you please send me the commands you are using
to run oprofile?
Thanks
Renato
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Santos, Jose Renato G
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:35 AM
>> To: 'Andrew Theurer'
>> Cc: Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xenoprof patches for xen-unstable
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> This is weird. Something seems wrong.
>> I am not familiar with the benchmark you are
>> running. Is this something easy to try?
>> If you could send me the code and some instructions on
>> how to use it, I can try running the same benchmark
>> in my environment.
>> I will also spend sometime looking more carefully
>> at xenoprof and my tests to see if I find anything wrong
>>
>> Renato
>>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Andrew Theurer [mailto:habanero@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:08 AM
>> >> To: Santos, Jose Renato G
>> >> Cc: Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xenoprof patches for xen-unstable
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wednesday 25 May 2005 14:10, Santos, Jose Renato G wrote:
>> >> > hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I have attached patches for enabling system wide profiling
>> >> > using oprofile for xen unstable.
>> >> > The patches were generated against change-set 1.1507 (May 22).
>> >> > The 4 attached files are
>> >> >
>> >> > 1) xenoprof.txt:
>> >> > - xenoprof overview and user guide
>> >> > 2) xenoprof-1.1-xen-3.0-devel.patch:
>> >> > - patch for xen
>> >> > 3) xenoprof-1.1-linux-2.6.11:
>> >> > - patch for linux. Note that this needs to be applied
>> >> > twice, once to linux-2.6.11-xen0 and once to
>> >> > linux-2.6.11-xenU. (This is different than the last
>> >> > patch which was created against the linux sparse tree).
>> >> > 4) xenoprof-1.1-oprofile-0.8.2:
>> >> > - patch for oprofile version 0.8.2
>> >>
>> >> Thanks very much for these; this is going to be extremly
>> >> helpful. I am
>> >> using these on xen-unstable-bk-1.1518 currently. One
>> >> problem: so far I
>> >> have not observed any ticks in xen-syms. I have tried SDET
>> >> benchmark,
>> >> which on your previous patches (for xen-2.0-testing), I
>> >> would get about
>> >> 12% of ticks in xen-syms.
>> >>
>> >> This is on a single cpu xen0 domain with no other domains
>> >> running. I
>> >> verified that the XENIMAGE and XEN_RANGE were getting passed to
>> >> oprofiled correctly. I do not specify any active or
>> passive domains
>> >> since this is the only domain running. Any ideas why I
>> >> would not get
>> >> any ticks for xen-syms?
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone else tried xenoprofile?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> -Andrew
>> >>
>>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|