WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree)

To: Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree)
From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:53:31 +0900
Cc: Xen Dev <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:52:47 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ST90xeIjJmKRnU4NmQZWMjA4nPPROWOW1u9p8en8xT9PSJIJ20EmqHNTFkds0EyAdf6ABJZz8kbGqZ0rQ/uSuJH9wQ0nN0Ouv8760xnOtsmfhFsBnQWnu59LrNV9mM5bnIsKLHgJZgNC1su3QtbYcBowWZ5aj/NBE3ul972HCzA=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3d8eece205053106414831da72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <9cde8bff050530182342a79827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3d8eece205053106414831da72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5/31/05, Christian Limpach <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/31/05, aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch (against -unstable ChangeSet@xxxxxx) does the followings:
> >
> > - put some configurable variables to xend_config.sxp, and set them to
> > default values. That will make people aware of their existence, and
> > let them easily reconfigure xend when needed.
> 
> I've not applied this part because we're not sure we're going to keep
> some of these.

i see the point, but how about part of this patch in -testing tree
(see http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-05/msg01204.html).
i believe that those options are stable, so if you apply -testing
patch (this -testing patch got no comment), we should keep the same
options in this patch, and not reject them all.

regards,
aq

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel