|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 09:14 -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> David F Barrera wrote:
> > May 24 22:14, 2005 Xen Unstable (xen-unstable-src.tgz)
> > * x86
> > * SLES 9/SP1, RHEL 4 and FC3 on IBM xSeries 305, 235,
> > HS20 and ThinkCentre
> > * Builds and boots without problems
> > * Able to create functional domains
> > * x86_64
> > * SLES 9/SP1 HS20 Blades Type 8843 (EMT64)
> > * Still broken- x86_64 build break in function
> > 'prefetchw'
> > * Bugzilla #34
> > * FC4 - HS20 Blade Type 8843 (EMT64)
> > * Xen built without error; however,
> > * Dom0 fails to boot. Bugzilla #26 ([Bug 26]
> > Dom0 fails to boot on x86_64) open for this
> > issue. * ------- Additional Comment #5 From
> > Arun Sharma 2005-05-21 04:57 -------
> > I just posted a patch to xen-devel. It
> > doesn't fix all the problems, but brings it
> > one step closer.
> >
> > We still need:
> >
> > - Jun's patch to arch/xen/x86_64/mm/init.c
> > - Fix xen to create the L4, L3 entries
> > correctly for the readonly MPT
> It will be more useful if you provide Latest ChangeSet info there. The
> above two are already in this week. Our expectation is that dom0 on
> x86-64 does not fail to boot. The latest one: Latest ChangeSet:
> 2005/05/25 14:43:27 1.1552 429480ffbijN4G0QJScaV1h7mcJ23Q boots fine as
> far as we tested.
Jun,
We are testing using the xen-unstable-src.tgz file, not from BK pulls,
so I don't have the changeset information. Once a decision is made on
the successor to BK, then we will begin planning how to include such
information.
>
> Jun
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|