|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal
On 5/23/05, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What happens to CPU usage in dom1 when tx checksumming is disabled?
dom1->dom0: 70.7% id, 0.0% wa, 1.7% hi, 15.0% si
dom1->external: 20.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.7% hi, 60.0% si
dom1->dom2: 77.7% id, 0.0% wa, 1.0% hi, 9.3% si
>
> Overall though these are the kind of results I would expect. Linux
> usually does csumming at the same time as it has to do a copy anyway,
> and it ends up being limited by memory/L2-cache bandwidth, not the
> extra computation. But the offload extensions haven't cost much to
> implement and there are probably cases where it helps a little.
>
> Maybe I'm being pessimistic though: Can you reproduce the rather more
> impressive speedups that you previously saw, Jon?
>
> -- Keir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Bin Ren
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Jon Mason
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal,
Bin Ren <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Jon Mason
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Bin Ren
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Jon Mason
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Nivedita Singhvi
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Bin Ren
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Rolf Neugebauer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Bin Ren
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal, Ian Pratt
|
|
|
|
|