|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?
 
> We are going to strip out the periodic ticker entirely (at least in 
> arch/x86) and have just a programmable one-shot timer. We 
> need to keep 
> track of what is the nearest event we care about so we know what to 
> program into the one-shot timer.
Yes, this is exactly what Xen/ia64 does today.
 
> I think the interface could be simplified a little (fold 
> mod_ac_timer/add_ac_timer into a single function, for 
> example), but the 
> implementation is already very pared down. I image it would 
> hardly save 
> 100 lines, or bytes of hypervisor code, to replace the heap with a 
> list, for example.
With the periodic ticker gone, all that's really left for
ac_timer is a Xen scheduler interrupt (I think).
Is the Xen scheduler interrupt per-cpu or is there a "monarch"?
If the latter, the usage of ac_timer keeps a'dwindling.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Ian Pratt
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?,
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Ian Pratt
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
  
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |