WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid64 bi

To: "Jerone Young" <jerone@xxxxxxxxx>, "Vincent Hanquez" <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid64 bit base/index
From: "Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 16:44:42 -0400
Cc: David F Barrera <dfbp@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 May 2005 20:44:21 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcVb49t3h5slwvVNR7+pQ26p1w9kxAABkzLA
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid64 bit base/index
So has the "prefetchw" bug been fixed? 
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34.

I am still seeing it on SLES9 SP1 x86_64. I am using the latest unstable
pull.

Aravindh

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jerone Young
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 3:57 PM
To: Vincent Hanquez
Cc: David F Barrera; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a
valid64 bit base/index

The fix for this is in bitkeeper now. It did not make it into the
unstable tar ball for the night. So you will not see this problem
tommorow.

On 5/18/05, Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:59:00AM -0500, David F Barrera wrote:
> > Using the May 17 xen-unstable-src.tgz on x86_64, the following error
> > occurs on a SLES 9 SP1 platform (It builds OK on Fedora Core 4, but
it
> > does not boot, and that is another issue):
> >
> > gcc -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing
-iwithprefix include
> > -Wall -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe
-I/tmp/xen-unstable/xen/include
> > -I/tmp/xen-unstable/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer
> > -msoft-float -m64 -mno-red-zone -fpic -fno-reorder-blocks
> > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -DNDEBUG -D__ASSEMBLY__ -c
x86_64/entry.S -o
> > x86_64/entry.o
> > x86_64/entry.S: Assembler messages:
> > x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index
> > expressionx86_64/entry.S:320: Error: `136+8(%esp)' is not a valid 64
bit
> > base/index expression
> 
> that's odd. could you verify you have the correct line on entry.S ?
> 
> line 317: setnz VCPUINFO_upcall_mask(%rax)
> line 320: movw  UREGS_cs+8(%rsp),%ax
> 
> as well, what compiler version are you using ?
> 
> --
> Vincent Hanquez
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>