|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid 64 b
The fix for this is in bitkeeper now. It did not make it into the
unstable tar ball for the night. So you will not see this problem
tommorow.
On 5/18/05, Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:59:00AM -0500, David F Barrera wrote:
> > Using the May 17 xen-unstable-src.tgz on x86_64, the following error
> > occurs on a SLES 9 SP1 platform (It builds OK on Fedora Core 4, but it
> > does not boot, and that is another issue):
> >
> > gcc -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix
> > include
> > -Wall -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe -I/tmp/xen-unstable/xen/include
> > -I/tmp/xen-unstable/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -O3
> > -fomit-frame-pointer
> > -msoft-float -m64 -mno-red-zone -fpic -fno-reorder-blocks
> > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -DNDEBUG -D__ASSEMBLY__ -c x86_64/entry.S -o
> > x86_64/entry.o
> > x86_64/entry.S: Assembler messages:
> > x86_64/entry.S:317: Error: `1(%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index
> > expressionx86_64/entry.S:320: Error: `136+8(%esp)' is not a valid 64 bit
> > base/index expression
>
> that's odd. could you verify you have the correct line on entry.S ?
>
> line 317: setnz VCPUINFO_upcall_mask(%rax)
> line 320: movw UREGS_cs+8(%rsp),%ax
>
> as well, what compiler version are you using ?
>
> --
> Vincent Hanquez
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|