 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] nr_pfns miscalculated
| To: | Scott Parish <srparish@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] nr_pfns miscalculated |
| From: | Christian Limpach <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 May 2005 14:45:25 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 12 May 2005 13:45:00 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=I7phDeuOziHUjyvrkl9U3Z6jpSmO0tW87DD4U/eD+x0uafQUn1EfEUNzaF8P8NLsDzDvzJibwNkvbKQkG35M2dBqKxnfIXrMuyMe7MLriFIhs7IiUg6PNt2exjjhA8NNr1GO+DLxZl5jnS2xT78WkGNmzKRp3G5d2a73PvgpQ7c= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050512112225.GA27910@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <20050512112225.GA27910@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 5/12/05, Scott Parish <srparish@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If i'm not mistaken, this was what was intended.
Looks to me like the current code tries to handle the case where an
e820 entry starts not on a page boundary -- not sure this is needed...
christian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Should shadow_lock be spin_lock_recursive?, Michael A Fetterman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] nr_pfns miscalculated, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [patch] nr_pfns miscalculated, Scott Parish |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] nr_pfns miscalculated, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
