 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] problem with the pro/1000 driver for intel gigabit ether
| To: | peter bier <peter_bier@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] problem with the pro/1000 driver for intel gigabit ethernet card |
| From: | Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 May 2005 10:41:31 -0700 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 11 May 2005 17:41:05 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=K+pr/33f2wqawaLJ9KD7+dIBUVo3KTqxZ2cIm/fUg6h6i32I8EMFbJA9FH5vYKjHjAumXa2PoA6fEwTLfMCHVkip2P9J6N7ZydovHf46i6ScvgPX9nibMwTclcTSj3IE3uBtBwB/RtwBGeH2EBmqAQZl4poK084NKhCYUq0iXvk= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <loom.20050511T181225-637@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <loom.20050511T181225-637@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
I can confirm that I've seen the exact same behaviour.
-Kip
On 5/11/05, peter bier <peter_bier@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I encountered a problem with dom0 when rebooting and running an intel
> gigabit card using the pro/1000 driver. When the system tries to shut
> down I get the following output of an strace command :
>
> .........
> 17:10:49.063616 socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3 <0.000029>
> 17:10:49.063689 ioctl(3, 0x8913, 0xbffffc80) = 0 <0.000018>
> 17:10:49.063751 ioctl(3, 0x8914, 0xbffffc80) = 0 <535.114722>
> 17:19:44.178567 close(3) = 0 <0.000026>
> 17:19:44.178679 exit_group(0) = ?
>
> observe the more than 500 seconds it takes for the second ioctl to complete !!
> I have found out that any input on the console keyboard or network interface
> immediately causes the system call to return.
>
> Is there a problem with interrupt delivery ?
>
> Peter Bier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] recent major -unstable changes cause ia64 build to bebroken, Hollis Blanchard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Should shadow_lock be spin_lock_recursive?, Arun Sharma |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] problem with the pro/1000 driver for intel gigabit ethernet card, peter bier |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] problem with the pro/1000 driver for intel gigabit ethernet card, Jon Mason |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
