RE: [Xen-devel] Weekly test report on Intel VT machines

["Yu, Lifeng" <lifeng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>]

We have no performace data now. We’ve been focused on functional correctness.

---

From: Yoshiya ETO [mailto:eto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 2005年4月23日 12:08
To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Yu, Lifeng
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Weekly test report on Intel VT machines

 

    Could you send out the result of a brief performance benchmark?

 

Thanks,

Yoshiya Eto

 

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yu, Lifeng
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 11:38 AM
To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Weekly test report on Intel VT machines

 

We are tracing the unstable version of bk tree by testing it on Intel VT machines. We try to start 32-bit VMX domain on 32-bit VT and do basic tests by weekly.

 

Latest update: 04/22/2005

 

Kernels: 2.6.11-xen0 #1 Fri Apr 22 09:06:11 CST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

Building Environment:

Based on Fedora Core 2

Xen bk tree changeset 1.1365

All tests run with with tls.disabled.

 

Intel em64T 3GHz noSMP noHT

128 MB of memory for Xen0 without HT or SMP support

256 MB of memory for VMX Domain(RHEL3U3).

Bochs used to config filesystem image.

 

Test Result:

Success to start 32-bit Xen0.

Success to start 32-bit VMX Domain.

Finish mini-LTP test on VMX Domain. The mini-LTP including sched commands ipc mm nptl pty dio fs quickhit.

 

Other details are available upon request.

 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel